[:az]QEYRİ ƏNƏNƏVİ AVTOMOBİL YANACAQLARININ ƏTRAF MÜHİTƏ TƏSİRİ[:ru]ВЛИЯНИЕ НЕТРАДИЦИОННОГО АВТОМОБИЛЬНОГО ТОПЛИВА НА ОКРУЖАЮЩУЮ СРЕДУ[:en]IMPACT OF UNCONVENTIONAL AUTOMOBILE FUELS ON THE ENVIRONMENT[:]

[:az]E.A. Rəhimov

Xülasə. Hal-hazırda avtomobil yanacaqlarının və tex­nologiyalarının geniş variantları ticari olaraq möv­cuddur. Bununla yanaşı, hər bir variantın ətraf mühitə yaratdığı təsirlərin mürəkkəb xarakteri istehlakçıya və ya menecerə yaxşı seçim etmək üçün çətin bir qərar ve­rir. Hətta siyasətçilər də daha təmiz variantların nisbi üs­tün­lükləri, onların yanacaq və nəqliyyat dövrünə nisbi tə­siri ilə bağlı problemlərlə üzləşə bilərlər. Bu mə­qa­lə­nin məqsədi nəqliyyat vasitələri və mövcud tex­no­lo­gi­yalar ilə həyat dövrü yanacağının istifadəsinin ətraf mü­hitə təsirlərinin qiymətləndirilməsi və özləri ilə əsas ya­na­caq/axın texnologiyaları arasındakı təmizləmə se­çi­m­lər­ini müqayisə etməkdir. Əldə edilmiş nəticələr əsa­sında Azərbaycan Respublikasının yol nəqliyyatında par­nik qazlarının azaldılması üçün təkliflər verilir.

 

Açar sözlər: Həyat dövrü qiymətləndirilməsi; ya­na­caq və nəqliyyat vasitələrinin seçimləri; iqlim də­yi­şi­kliyi; yol nəqliyyatı; parnik qazları.

ƏDƏBİYYAT

  1. Colvile R, Hutchinson E, Mindell J. The transport sec­tor as a source of air pollution. Atmospheric en­vironment 2001; 35: 1537-1565.
  2. Gao L, Winfield ZC. Life cycle assessment of en­vi­ronmental and economic impacts of advanced vehicles. Energies 2012; 5: 605-620.
  3. Torchio MF, Santarelli MG. Energy, environmental and economic comparison of different power­tra­in/ fu­el options using well-to-wheels assessment, ener­gy and external costs–European market analysis. Energy 2010; 35: 4156-4171.
  4. Lane DB. Life Cycle Assessment of Vehicle Fuels and Technologies. London Borough of Camden
  5. MacLean HL, Lave LB. Evaluating automobile fuel/propulsion system technologies. Progr Energ Combust 2003; 29: 1-69.
  6. Messagie M, Boureima F-S, Coosemans T, Macharis C, Mierlo JV. A range-based vehicle life cycle as­sessment incorporating variability in the en­vi­ron­mental assessment of different vehicle technologies and fuels. Energies 2014; 7: 1467-1482.
  7. Zgurovsky M. Sustainable Development Global Si­mulation: Analysis of Quality and Security of Human Life, INTECH Publisher; 2012.
  8. Shafiee S, Topal E. When will fossil fuel reserves be diminished? Energy policy 2009; 37: 181-189.
  9. Singh BR, Singh O. Global trends of fossil fuel re­ser­ves and climate change in the 21st century, INTECH Open Access Publisher; 2012.
  10. Kodjak D, Sanchez FP, Segafredo L. How Vehicle Standards and Fuel Fees Can Cut CO2 and Boost the Economy, The International Council on Clean Transportation (icct); 2012.
  11. Bartolozzi I, Rizzi F, Frey M. Comparison between hyd­rogen and electric vehicles by life cycle assessment: A case study in Tuscany, Italy. Applied Energy 2013; 101: 103-111.
  12. Mohammadi Ashnani HM, Johari A, Hashim H, Ha­sani E. Life Cycle Assessment of Palm Oil Biodiesel Production in Malaysia. Applied Mechanics and Materials 2014; 465: 1080-1086.
  13. Shen W, Han W, Chock D, Chai Q, Zhang A. Well-to-wheels life-cycle analysis of alternative fuels and vehicle technologies in China. Energy Policy 2012; 49: 296-307.
  14. Sobrino FH, Monroy CR, Pérez JLH. Biofuels and fos­sil fuels: Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) optimisation through productive resources Re­newable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2011; 15: 2621-2628.

Məqaləni yüklə[:ru]Э. A. Рагимов

Аннотация. В настоящее время в продаже име­ется широкий спектр вариантов топлива и тех­но­ло­гий для транспортных средств. Тем не ме­нее, слож­ный характер воздействия на ок­ру­жа­ющую среду, вызванный каждым вариантом, делает его жестким решением для потребителя или менеджера, в целях лучшего выбора. Да­же политики могут стол­к­нуть­ся с проб­ле­ма­ми в отношении относительных пре­имуществ более чистых вариантов и их отно­си­тель­ного вли­яния на топливный и транспортный цикл. Дан­ная статья представляет собой попытку оце­­нить экологические последствия авто­мо­биль­но­го топ­ли­ва и имеющиеся технологии на окру­жа­ю­щую среду в течение жизненного цикла, а также срав­нить более чистые варианты между собой и ос­нов­ным потоком топлива/технологий. Результатами это­го исследо­ва­ния являются предложения по сни­жению выбросов парниковых газов от ав­то­мо­биль­ного транспорта в Азербайджанской Рес­пуб­лике.

 

Ключевые слова: Оценка жизненного цикла; ва­рианты топлива и транспортных средств; из­ме­не­ние климата; выбросы парниковых газов; дорожный транспорт.

ЛИТЕРАТУРА

  1. Colvile R, Hutchinson E, Mindell J. The transport sec­tor as a source of air pollution. Atmospheric en­vironment 2001; 35: 1537-1565.
  2. Gao L, Winfield ZC. Life cycle assessment of en­vi­ronmental and economic impacts of advanced vehicles. Energies 2012; 5: 605-620.
  3. Torchio MF, Santarelli MG. Energy, environmental and economic comparison of different power­tra­in/ fu­el options using well-to-wheels assessment, ener­gy and external costs–European market analysis. Energy 2010; 35: 4156-4171.
  4. Lane DB. Life Cycle Assessment of Vehicle Fuels and Technologies. London Borough of Camden
  5. MacLean HL, Lave LB. Evaluating automobile fuel/propulsion system technologies. Progr Energ Combust 2003; 29: 1-69.
  6. Messagie M, Boureima F-S, Coosemans T, Macharis C, Mierlo JV. A range-based vehicle life cycle as­sessment incorporating variability in the en­vi­ron­mental assessment of different vehicle technologies and fuels. Energies 2014; 7: 1467-1482.
  7. Zgurovsky M. Sustainable Development Global Si­mulation: Analysis of Quality and Security of Human Life, INTECH Publisher; 2012.
  8. Shafiee S, Topal E. When will fossil fuel reserves be diminished? Energy policy 2009; 37: 181-189.
  9. Singh BR, Singh O. Global trends of fossil fuel re­ser­ves and climate change in the 21st century, INTECH Open Access Publisher; 2012.
  10. Kodjak D, Sanchez FP, Segafredo L. How Vehicle Standards and Fuel Fees Can Cut CO2 and Boost the Economy, The International Council on Clean Transportation (icct); 2012.
  11. Bartolozzi I, Rizzi F, Frey M. Comparison between hyd­rogen and electric vehicles by life cycle assessment: A case study in Tuscany, Italy. Applied Energy 2013; 101: 103-111.
  12. Mohammadi Ashnani HM, Johari A, Hashim H, Ha­sani E. Life Cycle Assessment of Palm Oil Biodiesel Production in Malaysia. Applied Mechanics and Materials 2014; 465: 1080-1086.
  13. Shen W, Han W, Chock D, Chai Q, Zhang A. Well-to-wheels life-cycle analysis of alternative fuels and vehicle technologies in China. Energy Policy 2012; 49: 296-307.
  14. Sobrino FH, Monroy CR, Pérez JLH. Biofuels and fos­sil fuels: Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) optimisation through productive resources Re­newable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2011; 15: 2621-2628.

Скачать статью[:en]E.A.Rahimov

Institute of Geography named after acad. H. Aliyev

Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences, 115 H. Javid ave, Baku, AZ1143

elmar_rahimov@yahoo.com

 

A b s t r a c t

A variety of alternatives of car fuels and technologies are on sale at present time. Nevertheless, the complex feature of ecological effects triggered by each alternative makes it a hard choice for customer or manager to find the most appropriate option. Even politicians can face issues with respect to comparative benefits of cleaner alternatives and their comparative impacts on transportation/fuel cycles. For this reason, the aim of current article is to estimate the life-cycle ecological effects of automobile fuels and accessible technologies and thus, to collate the cleaner alternatives with one another, along with the main stream fuel technologies. The results of this research provide suggestions for reducing greenhouse gas emissions from road transport in the Republic of Azerbaijan.

Keywords: Life-cycle evaluation, fuels and car alternatives, ecological effects, greenhouse gas emissions, road transport

 

REFERENCES

  1. Colvile R, Hutchinson E, Mindell J. The transport sec­tor as a source of air pollution. Atmospheric en­vironment 2001; 35: 1537-1565.
  2. Gao L, Winfield ZC. Life cycle assessment of en­vi­ronmental and economic impacts of advanced vehicles. Energies 2012; 5: 605-620.
  3. Torchio MF, Santarelli MG. Energy, environmental and economic comparison of different power­tra­in/ fu­el options using well-to-wheels assessment, ener­gy and external costs–European market analysis. Energy 2010; 35: 4156-4171.
  4. Lane DB. Life Cycle Assessment of Vehicle Fuels and Technologies. London Borough of Camden
  5. MacLean HL, Lave LB. Evaluating automobile fuel/propulsion system technologies. Progr Energ Combust 2003; 29: 1-69.
  6. Messagie M, Boureima F-S, Coosemans T, Macharis C, Mierlo JV. A range-based vehicle life cycle as­sessment incorporating variability in the en­vi­ron­mental assessment of different vehicle technologies and fuels. Energies 2014; 7: 1467-1482.
  7. Zgurovsky M. Sustainable Development Global Si­mulation: Analysis of Quality and Security of Human Life, INTECH Publisher; 2012.
  8. Shafiee S, Topal E. When will fossil fuel reserves be diminished? Energy policy 2009; 37: 181-189.
  9. Singh BR, Singh O. Global trends of fossil fuel re­ser­ves and climate change in the 21st century, INTECH Open Access Publisher; 2012.
  10. Kodjak D, Sanchez FP, Segafredo L. How Vehicle Standards and Fuel Fees Can Cut CO2 and Boost the Economy, The International Council on Clean Transportation (icct); 2012.
  11. Bartolozzi I, Rizzi F, Frey M. Comparison between hyd­rogen and electric vehicles by life cycle assessment: A case study in Tuscany, Italy. Applied Energy 2013; 101: 103-111.
  12. Mohammadi Ashnani HM, Johari A, Hashim H, Ha­sani E. Life Cycle Assessment of Palm Oil Biodiesel Production in Malaysia. Applied Mechanics and Materials 2014; 465: 1080-1086.
  13. Shen W, Han W, Chock D, Chai Q, Zhang A. Well-to-wheels life-cycle analysis of alternative fuels and vehicle technologies in China. Energy Policy 2012; 49: 296-307.
  14. Sobrino FH, Monroy CR, Pérez JLH. Biofuels and fos­sil fuels: Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) optimisation through productive resources Re­newable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2011; 15: 2621-2628.

Download the article[:]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *